Why Love Omnipotent will bring all sinners to repentance & salvation, even fallen angels:
1) He is Love & Omnipotent.
2) The alternatives, annihilation & endless tortures are beneath Him. He is more classy than that.
3) The Bible tells me so. See Col.1:16,20; Phil.2:9-11; 1 Cor.15:28; Rev.5:13, etc.
1) He is Love & Omnipotent.
2) The alternatives, annihilation & endless tortures are beneath Him. He is more classy than that.
3) The Bible tells me so. See Col.1:16,20; Phil.2:9-11; 1 Cor.15:28; Rev.5:13, etc.
Actually Jesus' sacrifice was planned to redeem fallen angels. The Bible says:
Col.1:16 For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through Him and for Him.
20 and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say, whether things on earth or things in heaven.
That translation merely implies that angels are not presently being "help[ed]", not that they never will be or can't be. Besides it makes no reference to demons (assumed to be fallen angels), but to angels. And the Greek word translated "destroy" can also mean "make idle:
https://biblehub.com/greek/2673.htm
This may be a better translation :
14Seeing, then, the children have partaken of flesh and blood, he himself also in like manner did take part of the same, that through death he might make idle him having the power of death — that is, the devil — 15and might deliver those, whoever, with fear of death, throughout all their life, were subjects of bondage, 16for, doubtless, of messengers it doth not lay hold, but of seed of Abraham it layeth hold,
Of course fallen angels are "ungodly".
To conclude with the OP's final point:
The Bible doesn't say they were "judged with being removed from eternity with God".
"He has made no provision for these fallen angels to be redeemed." Wrong. See Col.1:16,20.
In conclusion, the OP's article has failed to make it's point. I've also shown from the Bible that it is wrong.
Now you are just making stuff up out of your own imagination with no evidence, no quotes of anything i've said to back up your words, and no reasoning or logic to support your claims. You actually speak as if you know me, but it's obvious you don't (after all, how could you) & i know for a fact you are wrong. Which destroys your credibility here.
Not a fag, i.e. homosexual.
Another person with no credibility. And a constant liar.
If an eternal hell existed, it is God's choice to send people to hell and his choice alone, not their choice. Nobody says "I choose & want to suffer endless torments in hell, please send me there, God." God could be merciful & save them from such an unbelievably horrific & sadistic future by simply annihilating them out of existence. Then God wouldn't have to send anyone to "hell" let alone an endless hellish existence of torments. So your doctrine of God makes Him into a sicko sadistic monster worse than all the serial killers of history combined.
Moreover, God could choose to send unrepentant sinners to another place rather than that "hell" (the fiery lake) of endless torments. For example, He could send them somewhere where they wouldn't be allowed to harm anyone else & where they could spend eternity enjoying pleasures much like they did while alive on earth.
So even under the assumption that God chooses to send people to an endless lake of fire to be tormented forever based on how they lived during a brief lifetime, that choice is on God, not human beings. Because God had at least 3 alternatives to sending anyone to endless sufferings in hell. In addition to the two i stated above, He could have sent the unrepentant to a "hell" where they are corrected & eventually saved so they may join others in heaven. To fail to do so implies your God's love has an expiry date like a carton of milk or He is impotent to save (so He is not Omnipotent as Scripture says), or He doesn't want to save those in "hell", in which case He is not loving or good but a sicko sadistic monster.
Furthermore to bring endless sufferings on anyone for the relatively momentary sins of a lifetime is extremely unjust. Additionally, it is also pointless. Is it supposed to bring God glory or illicit praise from the saints in heaven. Quite the opposite.
Moreover, God could choose to send unrepentant sinners to another place rather than that "hell" (the fiery lake) of endless torments. For example, He could send them somewhere where they wouldn't be allowed to harm anyone else & where they could spend eternity enjoying pleasures much like they did while alive on earth.
So even under the assumption that God chooses to send people to an endless lake of fire to be tormented forever based on how they lived during a brief lifetime, that choice is on God, not human beings. Because God had at least 3 alternatives to sending anyone to endless sufferings in hell. In addition to the two i stated above, He could have sent the unrepentant to a "hell" where they are corrected & eventually saved so they may join others in heaven. To fail to do so implies your God's love has an expiry date like a carton of milk or He is impotent to save (so He is not Omnipotent as Scripture says), or He doesn't want to save those in "hell", in which case He is not loving or good but a sicko sadistic monster.
Furthermore to bring endless sufferings on anyone for the relatively momentary sins of a lifetime is extremely unjust. Additionally, it is also pointless. Is it supposed to bring God glory or illicit praise from the saints in heaven. Quite the opposite.
Looks like my logic is at least somewhat correct. You are molding God into what you want (need) Him to be, so you can live the way you want to here on earth, and in case you fail the test the first time, another chance will be given to you; a test that will be easy to pass because then you will know all the answers. I for one hope you're right, but I'm terrified of putting all my eggs into that basket. Eternity is a long time.
